论文部分内容阅读
对概念客观有效性的论证是康德知识论和黑格尔逻辑学成立的前提,因而是两者哲学体系中的核心论证。康德将知性范畴作为知识普遍必然性的根据并通过先验演绎完成了范畴适用于经验对象的合法性证明;黑格尔则在“关于意识的经验的科学”中,将知觉事物、主客对立的存在形式、现象和规律世界演证为力的概念的自我排斥和分裂的结果,从而解决了先验演绎遗留下的物自身问题,并在客观观念论的意义上论述了概念的客观有效性。黑格尔的论证也可以称为“(精神)现象学演绎”。
The demonstration of the objective and validity of the concept is the prerequisite for Kant’s epistemology and Hegelian logic’s establishment. Therefore, it is the core argument in the philosophical system of both. Kant regards intellectual category as the basis of the universal inevitability of knowledge and through the transcendental deduction, completes the proof of the legitimacy of the category applicable to the subject of experience. In Hegel’s Scientific Science of Consciousness, The form of the existence of the phenomenon and the law of the world as the force of the concept of self-exclusion and the result of split, so as to solve the transcendental deduction of the legacy of the matter itself, and in the sense of objective concept theory discussed the concept of objective validity . Hegel’s argument can also be called “(spiritual) phenomenological deduction ”.