也就是说:首先,要多谢笔记人老师的文字,提供了一个非常棒的讨论源和讨论平台。每次都如此绵密,而且兼具古今中外人与事均衡,其次,笔记人文章中的两张照片,及其一前一后的图文关系,又很容易让之后的讨论导向客体之间的“价值”比较,这在所难免……好在,integrity不只是针对客体的,因为,笔记人老师一开篇就破了题,“integrity的中文词汇都很耐人寻味。当我们形容某人heisamanofintegrity,指的是他的‘人格’。”而对我之前看似粗暴的回复言论,我觉得,之后炜冥的商榷,是颇具代表性的反应与纠结。 In other words: First of all, to thank the note teacher’s text, provides a great discussion of the source and discussion platform. Each time is so dense, but also the balance of both ancient and modern Chinese and foreign people, and second, the two pictures in the note man’s article, and one after the graphic relationship between the text, but also very easy to allow subsequent discussion between the object Integrity is not just object-oriented, because the note-taking teacher broke the first question, “integrity’s Chinese vocabulary is intriguing.” When we describe someone heisamanofintegrity, referring to his ’personality.’ "And to seemingly rude reply to my previous remarks, I think, after Wei Ming’s deliberation, is a representative reaction and entangled.