一、关于“十七年”历史研究的基本估价,学术界实际上存在着完全不同的两种看法:一种意见认为十七年历史研究虽然走过了曲折道路,但是总的来说取得了巨大的成绩;另一种意见,则认为十七年的史学完全服务于政治,它被“农民战争史的研究体系”所宠罩,故无学术独立性可言,甚至将十七年史学与“文革”十年中“四人帮”疯狂践踏、摧残历史科学、蓄意制造混乱、颠倒黑白扯到一 First, about the basic valuation of “seventeen years” historical research, there are actually two completely different views in academia: One opinion holds that although the study of seventeen years of history has gone through a tortuous path, it has generally achieved Huge achievements; another opinion, that seventeen years of history fully serve politics, it was “the history of peasant war history,” the pet, so no academic independence at all, and even seventeen years of history and During the “Cultural Revolution” decade, the “gang of four” trampled crazy, destroying historical science, deliberately creating chaos, and turning black and white to one