廖彩桂同志在《不打哪能成器》中谈到,要给青少年以磨折,才会“严师出高徒”。还以自己教育一个“顽童”成为优秀学生的实例,表示赞同“教育家马卡连柯一巴掌打好了一个学生”的说法和做法,最后断言,教育儿童只有采用打骂的方法,得出“不打哪能成器”的结论。当真是这样吗?我看不然。我们知道,学生“顽皮”的原因是多方面的,诸如家庭的溺爱和打骂、师生的歧视、社会上个别坏人的唆使,等等。如果不具体分析,采取说服教育 Comrade Liu Caiu-ki said in his speech, “If we can not fight, we should talk about giving grind to teens, and we will only” make outstanding teachers out of class. “ But also to educate himself a ”urchin“ as an example of outstanding students, agreeing with ”educator Makarenko slapped a student,“ the statement and practice, the final assertion that educating children only by using the curse method, come to ”Do not fight which can become a device“ conclusion. Really? I see otherwise. We know that students are ”naughty" for many reasons, such as family spoils and beatings, teacher-student discrimination, the instigation of individual bad guys in society, and so on. If not specific analysis, take persuasion education