从行政伦理上讲,政府是公民联合聘请的大管家,公民申请政府公开“三公”经费,就好像主人要求管家报一下账,说说钱都花哪儿了,这乃是天经地义的事情。何况,《政府信息公开条例》亦有明确规定,“涉及公民、法人或者其他组织切身利益的;需要社会公众广泛知晓或者参与的;反映本行政机关机构设置、职能、办事程序等情况”的信息应当主动公开。然而,近年来一些地方政府和有关部门非但没有做到主动公开,面对公民申请还充满了傲慢和偏见。河南省南阳市青年王清对当地181个政府部门,提出包括“三公”经费在内的7项信息公开申请,许多部门没有实质性回复,他本人反而被当成了间谍跟踪和监视。 From an administrative ethical point of view, the government is a big housekeeper hired jointly by citizens. Citizens’ application for “three official” funds by the government is just as if the host demanded that the housekeeper should report it and talk about where the money has been spent. Moreover, the “Regulations on the Disclosure of Government Information” also clearly stipulates that “involving the interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, and requiring extensive public awareness or participation by the general public”, “reflecting the establishment, functions and procedures of the administrative organs” The information should be proactive. However, in recent years, some local governments and relevant departments have not only failed to take the initiative to disclose but also faced arrogance and prejudice in the face of citizenship applications. Wang Qing, a young man from Nanyang City, Henan Province, submitted seven applications for information disclosure to 181 local government departments, including the “three public funds.” Many departments did not respond substantively. Instead, he himself was treated as a spy tracking and surveillance.