论文部分内容阅读
１８９９年，东亚同文会为了展开对华民间外交，介入在中国革新进程中日显重要的广东地区的事务，继续乐善堂和东亚会激进派的组织与活动，派人到广州设立广东支部，并派出６名留学生。他们设立事务所，联络士绅，开办东亚同文书院，向潮汕东文学堂派遣教师，取得《知新报》与《东华报》的响应，并计划与当地士绅创刊《东亚报》。１９００年夏，正当其活动顺利展开时，东亚同文会本部突然宣布暂时撤消该支部。其背后原因在于广东支部各成员深深介入了保皇会和革命党在华南策划的勤王、独立等反清密谋，并力图通过以镜湖茶谈社为代表的一批省港澳革新人士，促成两派的联合大举。这与该会公开宣称的“保全中国论”形式上有所冲突。而革、保双方最终不能合作，令该会担心必败无疑的单独一方举事，会影响其在长江流域的布署乃至全会的事业。不过，广东支部的名义撤消后，其成员大都继续留在省港澳一带，表明东亚同文会内部不同派系的意见分歧，并未导致该会放弃在华南的利益以及对革保两派的关注和联系。由于该支部所负使命明暗参半，当事各方又有所忌讳，以致相关史实模糊不清，有关论著错漏较多。本文比勘中日各方的公私记载，重建信史之外，可见近代中外关系的大框架之下国家与社会的互动作用。
In 1899, in order to expand its non-governmental diplomacy with China, East-China Tongwen Club intervened in Guangdong’s affairs that are increasingly important in the process of China’s reform and continued the organization and activities of the Lushan Tang and East Asia Radicals, sending people to Guangzhou to set up Guangdong branches, And sent 6 students. They set up offices, contacted gentry, started East Asian Tongwen College, dispatched teachers to the Chaoshan East Chinese School to obtain the news of the newspaper and the Tungpei Daily and planned to start the publication of the East Asia News with the local gentry. In the summer of 1900, just as its activities were successfully carried out, the headquarters of the Tongan Association in East Asia suddenly announced the temporary withdrawal of the branch. The reason behind this is that all members of the Guangdong branch deeply intervened in the anti-Qing plot such as Qinwang and independence planned by the Royalties and Revolutionaries in southern China and tried hard to help a group of provincial, Hong Kong and Macao innovators, represented by Jinghu Dafa Society, A joint alliance. This is in conflict with the formally declared “preservation of China theory.” The eventual failure of the two sides to cooperate so that the fear of the defeat of a single party will affect the deployment of the Yangtze River Basin and even the plenary session. However, after the withdrawal of the name of the Guangdong branch, most of its members continued to stay in the province of Hong Kong and Maucao. This shows that differences of opinion among different factions within the Tongwen Club of East Asia did not result in it relinquishing its interests in South China and its concern and connection with the two parties . Since the mission of the branch is shady and gloomy, all parties concerned have taboo, so that the relevant historical facts are vague and unclear. Compared with the public records of all the parties in China and Japan and the reconstruction of the history of the letter, this article shows the interaction between the state and the society under the great framework of modern Sino-foreign relations.