论文部分内容阅读
OECD《需求侧创新政策》报告的发布,引起了我国政策界和学术界的高度重视,也留下了如何学习“先进”国家经验的政策难题。通过回溯需求侧创新政策及其代表性政策工具创新型公共采购的学术渊源,本文指出:对需求的不同理解、把握和反应能力从理论上构成了“先进”国家对该政策认知和实践迥异的原因。进而在样本有限的情况下,借助MVQAP方法实证了这种知行之间的张力并揭示了其背后所可能存在的“理性”。进而在回顾主要政策企业家埃德勒(Jakob Edler)博士政策倡导工作的基础上,澄清欧盟国家推行“万灵药”式需求侧创新政策的核心,在于为探索不同于美国式/技术推动型线性创新模型的发展道路提供必要的合法性基础。因此对于中国而言,还市场更大的空间去通过自身界定需求,以及重拾发现和解决创新激励与扩散问题的自信,才是真正需要我国学习的“最佳实践”和当务之急。
The publication of OECD “Demand Side Innovation Policy” report has aroused the great attention of policy and academic circles in our country. It has also left a policy problem of how to learn the “advanced” national experience. By tracing back the academic origins of demand-side innovation policy and its representative policy tools for innovative public procurement, this paper points out that different understanding, grasping and responding ability to demand constitute theoretically “advanced” countries’ understanding of the policy and Reasons for different practice. Furthermore, under the limited sample, the tension between knowledge and practice is demonstrated by MVQAP method and the “rational” behind it may be revealed. On the basis of reviewing the advocacy work of Dr. Jakob Edler, a major policy entrepreneur, it is clarified that the core of the European Union’s “Scenario Building” policy on innovation is to explore ways to explore new ways of thinking different from the American-style / technology The Road to Promote a Linear Innovation Model provides the necessary legitimacy foundation. Therefore, for China, more room for the market to define itself through its own needs and to regain confidence in finding and resolving issues of innovation, incentives and proliferation is the “best practice” and top priority that China really needs to learn.