论文部分内容阅读
实践美学的元范畴是“实践”。“实践”是与人的“劳动”紧密相关、甚至二位一体的概念,而“劳动”曾被界说为人与动物的根本区别;“实践”是在“社会关系”中进行、并反映“社会关系”的,所以,人的特性、本质又被界定为“社会关系的总和”。这两种观点是万无一失的吗?如何准确理解二者的关系?本文就此展开重新检讨,希望对实践美学反思赖以立足的元范畴是否逻辑自洽提供有益的启示和参考。
The meta-category of practical aesthetics is “practice ”. “Practice ” is closely related to human “labor ” and even the concept of the two in one “labor ” has been defined as the fundamental difference between man and animal; “practice Social relations, ”and reflect “ social relations ”, therefore, the nature of human nature has been defined as“ the sum of social relations. ” How to accurately understand the relationship between the two? This article will start a new review, hoping to provide a useful enlightenment and reference for whether or not the meta-categories based on practical aesthetics reflection should be based on logic self-consistency.