马克思的《政治经济学批判》和《资本论》第1卷第1篇研究的对象是相同的。关于这两者的关系,他除了指出“前书的内容已经概述在这一卷的第一章”外,还指出“前书已经详细阐述的内容,这里只略略提到。”正是后一提示,使我不时研读在《资本论》中只略为提到、或不曾提到,而在《批判》中不仅详细阐述、而且在我看来十分精辟的论点。现在提出来的就是马克思关于纸币流通规律是金币(包括银币,即以贵金属为材料的货币)流通规律的颠倒的论 Marx's “Critique of Political Economy” and “Capital” Volume 1, Part 1 of the research object is the same. As to the relationship between the two, apart from pointing out that “the content of the previous book has been outlined in the first chapter of this volume,” he also points out that “the first book has already elaborated on it and it is only briefly mentioned here.” It is the latter Prompt, so that I study from time to time in the “capital” only referred to, or not mentioned, but not only elaborated in the “critique”, but also in my opinion very brilliant argument. Now put forward is Marx's law on the circulation of notes is the inverted theory of the circulation of gold (including silver, that is, the precious metal for the material)