中医护理干预对高度水肿肾病综合征患者感染发生率的影响

来源 :中国医药指南 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:zpe3werv
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的 探讨中医护理干预对高度水肿肾病综合征患者感染发生率的影响?方法选择丹东市中医院收治的66例高度水肿肾病综合征患者为研究对象,时间为2019年5月至2020年6月,根据随机数字表法将患者分为两组,每组33 例?对照组实施常规护理,观察组实施中医护理,比较两组患者护理满意度,护理后生活质量?感染发生情况?结果 观察组总感染率9.09%,低于对照组45.45%(P < 0.05), 观察组护理满意度为93.93%,高于对照组72.72%(P < 0.05)?两组患者护理后生活质量均好于护理前,观察组患者护“,”Objective To explore the effect of traditional Chinese medicine nursing intervention on the incidence of infection in patients with high-edematous nephrotic syndrome. Methods A total of 66 patients with high-edematous nephrotic syndrome treated in our hospital from May 2019 to June 2020 were selected as the research object. According to the random number table method, the patients were divided into two groups, with 33 cases in each group. The control group implemented routine nursing and the observation group implemented traditional Chinese medicine nursing. The nursing satisfaction, quality of life and infection of the two groups were compared. Results The total infection rate in the observation group was 9.09%, lower than 45.45% in the control group (P<0.05), and the nursing satisfaction in the observation group was 93.93%, higher than 72.72% in the control group (P<0.05). The quality of life after nursing in the two groups was better than that before nursing, and the quality of life after nursing in the observation group was better than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Patients with high-edematous nephrotic syndrome have a higher risk of infection. Traditional Chinese medicine nursing intervention can actively prevent and reduce the risk of infection, improve the quality of life of patients, and have high nursing satisfaction.
其他文献
目的 分析快速康复路径在胫腓骨骨骨折患者中的应用效果?方法选择鞍山市中心医院接诊的88例胫腓骨骨折患者为研究对象, 时间为2017年9月至2018年9月,根据随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组44 例,对照组实施常规性护理措施,观察组实施快速康复护理,比较不同护理措施的应用效果?结果 对照组患者护理满意度为79.5%,低于观察组的95.5%,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)?术后当天与术后1 周,患者的VAS 评分均降低,且观察组VAS 评分低“,”Objective To analyze the a
目的 观察急诊老年冠心病合并高血压患者中应用优质护理的临床效果?方法 选择2017年8月至2018年9月到我院进行治疗的100例老年冠心病合并高血压患者为研究对象,随机数字表法分为观察组(n=50,实施优质护理)和对照组(n=50,实施常规护理),比较两组患者护理效果?结果 观察组的护理满意度?血压控制率和病情知晓率均明显高于对照组(P < 0.05)?护理后观察组的物质生活?躯体功能?心理功能和社会功能评分明显高于对照组(P < 0.05)?结论 老年性冠心病合并高血压患者接受急诊救治的过程中,提供优质