论文部分内容阅读
秸秆禁烧,利大于弊。众所周知,禁了多年,花费颇多,但“迷雾”始终驱之不散。甚至采取大量的行政、法律措施和手段,比如将禁烧考核结果纳入对各市及县的年度环保目标考核体系,与项目审批立项、环保补助资金安排、农村生态创建等直接挂钩,但还是星火燎原。有个别地方,干部实在无法,就和农民商定时间焚烧,以避开省市检查和卫星拍照。秸秆禁烧,为何屡禁不止呢?下面就对其展开一系列的分析和探讨。
Burning straw, the benefits outweigh the disadvantages. As we all know, banned for many years, spent a lot, but “fog ” has always been driven. Even taking a large number of administrative and legal measures and measures, for example, integrating the results of the Prohibition Examination into the annual environmental assessment system of cities and counties, which is directly linked with the examination and approval of projects, the arrangement of funds for environmental protection and the creation of rural ecology. In some places, cadres really can not agree with the farmers to burn time to avoid provincial and municipal inspection and satellite photography. Straw banned, why repeated prohibition it? Below to start a series of its analysis and discussion.