从历史发展来看,逻辑与修辞在不同时代法学中的角色变迁是产生法律解释内在矛盾的根源。本文首先对不同视角下法律解释理论的基本内容进行分析,揭示了法律解释在知识属性上的嬗变;然后,在总结法律解释理论发展经验的基础上认为,逻辑与修辞各对法律解释的合法性、合理性以及实践性皆有裨益,因此,我国法律解释理论的展开不可偏废其一。 From the perspective of historical development, the change of roles of logic and rhetoric in jurisprudence of different ages is the source of the inherent contradictions in legal interpretation. This article first analyzes the basic content of the legal interpretation theory from different perspectives and reveals the evolution of the legal interpretation in the knowledge attributes. Then, on the basis of summing up the experience of the development of legal interpretation theory, it is considered that the legitimacy of logic and rhetoric for legal interpretation , Rationality and practicality are all helpful, therefore, the development of our legal interpretation theory can not be neglected one.