论文部分内容阅读
目的了解社区肿瘤健康教育项目实施后,居民肿瘤相关知识、态度、行为状况及项目相关信息被社区居民认同情况。方法采用随机整群抽样方法,抽取13~70岁常住居民3410人进行问卷调查。结果居民中肿瘤病因知识知晓率较高,在70.1%~96.7%之间,对肺瘤早期症状知晓率较低,在12.8%~79.2%之间。不同性别、不同年龄、不同文化程度及是否有肿瘤家族史人员间肿瘤知识得分存在显著性差异(P<0.01)。96.4%的居民“赞同防治肿瘤与老百姓有关”的说法,每周吃新鲜蔬菜水果达到5~7天者,占70.0%;吃腌制食物每周少于1天和1~2天者为58.6%;不吃高脂和烧考类食物或每周吃两类食物少于1天者分别为61.7%、67.0%。调查人群吸烟率为27.1%,男女间存在显著性差异。每周锻炼次数达到5次以上者占22.1%。项目信息问卷调查717人,知道社区开展肿瘤健康促进活动的为74.2%,对项目有兴趣的为90.4%,能理解宣传小册子内容的为98.1%。认为有必要开展本项目的占56.2%。结论部分居民对肿瘤相关知识了解不足,相关危险行为在一些人的身上仍然存在。调查人员对项目知晓和认同率较高,说明项目开展的方式是可行的。
Objective To understand the implementation of community oncology health education project, the residents’ knowledge of tumor related knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and project-related information were recognized by the community residents. Methods A randomized cluster sampling method was used to collect 3410 residents of 13 to 70-year-old permanent residents for a questionnaire survey. Results The awareness rate of cancer etiology in residents was high, ranging from 70.1% to 96.7%. The rate of awareness of early symptoms of tumors was low, ranging from 12.8% to 79.2%. There was a significant difference in the scores of tumor knowledge between different genders, ages, education levels, and family history of cancer (P<0.01). 96.4% of the residents “argued that the prevention and treatment of cancer is related to the people ”, eating fresh fruits and vegetables every week to reach 5 to 7 days, accounting for 70.0%; eat pickled food less than 1 day and 1 to 2 days per week It was 58.6%; those who did not eat high-fat and burnt test foods or eat two types of foods per week for less than 1 day were 61.7% and 67.0%, respectively. The smoking rate in the survey population was 27.1%. There was a significant difference between men and women. More than 5 times weekly exercise accounted for 22.1%. The project information survey questionnaire surveyed 717 people. It was found that 74.2% of the communities had carried out tumor health promotion activities, 90.4% were interested in the project, and 98.1% of them were able to understand the content of the promotion brochure. It is considered that 56.2% of the project needs to be carried out. Conclusion Some residents lack understanding of tumor-related knowledge, and related risk behavior still exists in some people. The investigators’ knowledge of the project and the high recognition rate indicate that the project is feasible.