论文部分内容阅读
一 艾略特在1963年重印30年代初的诺顿演讲时对《传统与个人才能》一文屡屡被作为他的代表作收入文集深感失望。他在自己最后的一篇文章里坦率地承认,他早期关于诗和诗人的种种宏论往往是对自己当时刻意追求的诗体的辩护,有一种鼓动家的热情和紧迫感,因而容易为人接受。这样看来艾略特早期的批评实践与理论背道而驰。针对印象派文论他倡导亚里士多德的“科学心智”,希望通过“超然无执地运用智性”达到评论的客观。歌德和柯勒律治作为批评家与此理想相去太远,因为他们不能以无我之
When Eliot reprinted the Norton speech of the early 1930s in 1963, he was deeply disappointed with the article entitled “Tradition and Individual Competency” as his collection of income. In his last essay, he confessed frankly that his earlier generalizations of poetry and poets were often a justification of the poetic gentry at the time, which was deliberately pursued at the time, with an agitative and urgent sense of agitation that made it easy to accept. It seems that Eliot’s early criticism runs counter to theory. He advocated Aristotle’s “scientific mind” for Impressionism, hoping to reach the objective of the commentary through “using transcendental no-intelligence to achieve intelligence.” Goethe and Coleridge as critics are so far from this ideal that they can not live without me