明清鼎革之际,陈洪绶为何不生取义、慷慨死节?本文从“辞禄臣与乞食人”、“骨肉爱根谁断得”和“中兴画学传後世”等三个方面分别作深入探讨。管陈洪绶曾捐贡以求功名,书画却从来不祗是他生存的手段。“中兴画学”虽於他辞世前才有所表述,然而喜好和专研书画,实是他终身不渝的志趣。清初王夫之、黄宗羲、顾炎武等学者分析明亡之际士人“死社稷、死城守、君亡与亡”的事例,陈洪绶的所作所为是否可看作是与“君亡与亡”之背道而驰?本文强调的老莲晚年的心路历程表明,没有走上“成仁”之途的他,恰恰於此迸发出自身生命最为成功的艺术光辉。 Ming and Qing Dynasties leather occasion, Chen Hongshou why not justify, generous dead section? This article from “Resignation Hill minister and begging people ”, “flesh and blood root who get ” and “ZTE painting biography ”And other three areas for in-depth discussion. Chen Hongshu had donated tribute to his fame, painting and calligraphy has never been only a means of his survival. “ZTE ” Although he did not express before his death, but like and study painting, it is his eternal interest. In the early Qing Dynasty, scholars such as Wang Fuzhi, Huang Zongxi and Gu Yanwu analyzed whether Chen Hongshou’s actions could be considered as “death of the dead and death of the dead” This article emphasizes the mentality of Laolian in his later years and shows that he did not embark on the path of “becoming a man.” It just sparked the most brilliant artistic glory in his own life.