近期,一篇题为“日本首相安倍晋三的历史老师发文批判安倍”的文章在网络和社交媒体上热传,虽然最后证实这篇博文的作者并非安倍的历史老师,而是一名律师。但文中所提及安倍晋三在国会辩论中公然否认《波茨坦公告》,确实是对他高中历史老师的亵渎,难怪文章中愤慨地说“你的高中历史当初应该给你不及格”。在笔者看来,暂且不论安倍对于二战这段历史的认识是真的无知还是故意装失忆,至少作为日本领导人的历史情感教育是缺失的,作为他当年的历史教师确实是羞愧的,也存在一定的教育不当责任。当然,这与日本整个国家对侵略历史的反省不够有关。然而,反观国内近期互联网中不断质疑的邱少云违背生理学常识、张灵甫是不是抗日名将等,虽然这些是不值得一驳的历史谣言,但事实上即使是文科班中学了三年历史的毕业生也辨不清真伪。 Recently, an essay entitled “Criticism of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s History Teacher Abe” criticized the internet and social media. Although the author of this blog was confirmed not to be Abe’s historical teacher but to a lawyer . However, the article mentions that Abe’s open denial of the “Potsdam Proclamation” in parliamentary debates really desecrates his high school history teacher. No wonder the article said angrily: “Your high school history should have failed you.” In the author’s opinion, for the moment, whether Abe’s knowledge of the history of World War II is true ignorance or intentional memory loss, at least history education as a leader of Japan is absent. As a history teacher of his year, he was indeed ashamed and there existed Certain educational misconduct. Of course, this is not related to the insufficient reflection on the history of aggression by the entire Japanese nation. However, on the other hand, Qiu Shanyu, who is constantly questioned in the Internet in China, runs counter to the common sense of physiology and Zhang Lingfu is not a famous anti-Japanese warrant. Although these are not worthy of mentioning the historical rumors, they are in fact even graduated from the three-year history of liberal arts classes Unclear authenticity