论文部分内容阅读
实践美学与后实践美学的论争在世纪末的交锋中更多体现为理论核心语词的更新或意义转换,后实践美学并未突破实践美学的命题限定,直面日益发展的社会现实,激烈的争论并未引发思维范式的重大变革。进入新世纪以来,实践美学与后实践美学的理论争鸣向思维方式变革深化,对超越二元对立思维方式以及方法论的现代转型的思想吁求显示出双方在理论反省后自觉的思维转换与理论重建。借助辩证思维,以“理解—对话”的方式剖析总结现实美学问题,去除体系化所易产生的理论封闭性现象,是这场美学之争取得建设性成就的根本所在。
In the confrontation of the end of the century, the debate between practical aesthetics and post-practical aesthetics is more reflected in the renewal or meaning conversion of the core words of the theory. Post-practical aesthetics does not break through the proposition limits of practical aesthetics and confront the ever-growing social reality. The fierce debate has not Lead to major changes in the paradigm of thinking. Since the beginning of the new century, the theoretical debate between practical aesthetics and post-practical aesthetics has deepened the transformation of thinking modes. The appeals for thinking beyond transcendental dual opposition and the modern transformation of methodology show that both sides consciously transform their thinking and rebuild their theories after their theoretical introspection. With dialectical thinking, analyzing and summarizing realistic aesthetics issues in an “understanding-dialogue” way and removing the theoretical closed phenomenon that is systematized are the fundamental cause of this constructive achievement in this aesthetic struggle.