论文部分内容阅读
选择我院2011年8月~2014年3月收治的960例本院分娩的孕妇为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察组各480例,对照组实施常规护理,观察组在常规护理基础上开展产前护理干预,对两组产妇分娩方式、妊娠结局等进行比较。结果观察组自然分娩率明显较对照组高(P<0.05);观察组产程时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05);观察组产后出血、新生儿窒息及产后抑郁发生率均明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。孕妇实施产前护理干预,可促进子宫恢复,提高自然分娩率,利于母婴结局,值得临床进一步推广。
Select our hospital from August 2011 to March 2014 admitted to the 960 pregnant women delivered in our hospital as the research object, were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group of 480 cases, the control group to implement routine care, observation group based on routine care To carry out prenatal care intervention, the two groups of maternal delivery methods, pregnancy outcomes were compared. Results The rate of spontaneous delivery in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P <0.05), and the duration of labor in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P <0.05). The incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal asphyxia and postpartum depression in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group Group (P <0.05). Pregnant women to implement prenatal care intervention can promote uterine recovery and improve the rate of natural delivery, which will benefit the outcome of maternal and child, it is worth further clinical promotion.