论文部分内容阅读
随着现代文学研究的拓展 ,现代文学文献的搜集与整理工作的重要性与日俱增。遗憾的是 ,虽然这种感受大家都有 ,可是现代文学的文献工作到底该怎么做 ,应遵循什么样的工作规范 ,它与古典文献学有什么异同 ,怎样的工作路径对它比较适合 ,以及文献工作与学术创新到底是什么关系 ,诸如此类的问题始终未能得到深入的探讨。现代文学文献工作的“落后”无疑迟滞了现代文学研究的深入开展。为了改变这种局面 ,清华大学中文系、北京大学中文系、河南大学文学院、中国现代文学馆、鲁迅博物馆五单位于 2 0 0 3年 1 2月下旬共同发起“中国现代文学的文献问题座谈会”。会前 ,由刘增杰、王风、张桂兴和解志熙四位先生分别就师陀、废名、老舍和于赓虞著述的编校整理情况各准备了一篇发言稿 ,提前分送准备与会的诸位先生参阅 ;座谈会上各位先生又结合各自的工作体会和现代文学文献工作的实际做了即席发言。会后根据录音整理了一组笔谈。此外座谈会还委托解志熙先生就此次会议所达成的共识整理出一份述要。这些文字或许不无参考价值 ,本刊特辟专辑予以刊布 (刘增杰先生的专题发言稿《〈师陀全集〉编校余墨———兼及现代作家文集编辑中的若干问题》已在本刊 2 0 0 4年第 1期发表 ) ,希望有更多的学界同行能就此问题发表?
With the development of modern literature, the importance of collecting and arranging the literature of modern literature is increasing day by day. Regrettably, though this feeling is shared by all of us, what kind of work norms should be followed in the literature work of modern literature? What are the similarities and differences between it and classical philology? What kind of work paths are suitable for it? Literature and academic innovation in the end what is the relationship between such issues have not been in-depth discussion. The “backwardness” in the literature of modern literature has undoubtedly delayed the further development of modern literature. In order to change this situation, Tsinghua University Department of Chinese, Peking University Department of Chinese, Henan University School of Liberal Arts, Chinese Modern Literature Museum, Lu Xun Museum five units in late February 2003 co-sponsored the “Literature of Modern Chinese Literature Forum meeting”. Before the meeting, a speech was prepared by Mr. Liu Zengjie, Mr. Wang Feng, Mr. Zhang Guixing and Mr. Xie Zhixi respectively on the editing and collation of the writings of Shituo, Fei Ming, Laoshe and Yu Zhaoyu, and delivered in advance to the gentlemen who were going to attend the meeting See; symposium gentlemen also combined their own work experience and the actual work of literature and literature to make an impromptu speech. After the meeting according to the recording finishing a group of pen. In addition, the symposium commissioned Mr. Xie Zhi Xi to compile a summary of the consensus reached at this meeting. The text may not have no reference value, the publication of special publication to be published (Mr. Liu Zengyi’s special speech “ editing and remnants of ink --- and the collection of modern writers,” a number of issues in this issue 2 0 0 4, the first issue), hope more academic colleagues can publish on this issue?