论文部分内容阅读
在语法学界,对一部分有支配关系的词语属于哪个层级的语言单位的问题有不同见解。如,有人认为“吃饭”这个词语,当“饭”没有特指“米饭”时,“吃饭”应视为一种行为。从内容上,它具有固定的意义;从语音形式上。“吃”与“饭”之间没有语音上的停顿,可以视为语音和意义结合的最小的语言单位——词。如果这个观点成立的话,“看戏”是不是也应该算作一种行为?因为“吃饭”、“看戏”从结构到语音形式都具有同一性。如果可以认定的话,“去看电影了”的“看电影”算不算词呢?
In grammar, there are different opinions on the question of which level of linguistic units a dominant dictation belongs to. For example, some people think that “eating” is the word “meal” should be considered as an act when “rice” does not specifically refer to “rice.” From the content, it has a fixed meaning; from the phonetic form. There is no phonetic pause between “eating” and “rice,” which can be viewed as the smallest unit of speech in which speech and meaning combine. If this point of view is established, should “watching theater” be regarded as a kind of behavior? Because “eating” and “watching opera” have the same structure from the phonetic form. If you can be sure, “go to the movies,” “watching movies” is not considered words?