论文部分内容阅读
无论是从我国的传统文化来看,还是从马克思土义经典作家的观点来看,“剥削”都是不正当的、不道德的甚至是非法的行为。依据传统理论,我国“允许并大力鼓励私有经济发展”的政策和“社会主义社会否定剥削、消灭剥削”的根本宗旨之间存在着矛盾冲突。解决矛盾的科学路径不是放弃剥削范畴的“非合法性”界定,而是打破私有经济天然地恒等于剥削的传统观念,同时确立私营经济中可能存在着剥削但社会和政府也能够解决和治理剥削的新理念。此外,对剥削现象存在的制度背景或体制原因应该进行重新认识。
Whether viewed from our country’s traditional culture or from the point of view of Marxist classic writers, “exploitation” is unjust, unethical or even illegal. According to the traditional theory, there is a contradiction between our policy of “allowing and vigorously encouraging the development of the private economy” and the fundamental purpose of “denying and exploiting the socialist society”. Rather than abandoning the definition of “non-legitimacy” in the sphere of exploitation, the scientific path to resolving conflicts is to break the traditional concept that the private economy is naturally equal to exploitation while establishing the possible existence of exploitation in the private economy but also that the society and the government can solve New concept of governance and exploitation. In addition, the institutional background or institutional reasons for the phenomenon of exploitation should be re-recognized.