论文部分内容阅读
法院是当今社会解决社会矛盾纠纷的主要机构,法院做出司法判决的可接受性成为反映司法正义的重要指标。从论辩修辞角度出发,总结论辩修辞影响司法判决可接受性的途径、我国司法判决可接受性低的现状及其后果,分析造成我国司法判决可接受性低的论辩修辞原因,最终从论辩修辞方面提出建立完善的司法判决说理制度、改进法官选任制度、加强法官素质培养、树立社会公众对论辩修辞的正确认识等改善司法判决可接受性的对策建议。
Courts are the main institutions in today’s society to resolve social conflicts and disputes. The court’s acceptance of judicial decisions is an important indicator of judicial justice. From the perspective of argument rhetoric, this paper summarizes the ways in which the rhetoric of rhetoric affects the acceptability of judicial decisions, the current situation and consequences of the low acceptability of judicial decisions in our country, and analyzes the reasons for the rhetoric of argumentation that causes the low judicial acceptance in our country. It puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions on how to improve the acceptability of judicial decisions by establishing a sound adjudication system of judicial decisions, improving the system of selecting judges, strengthening the training of the quality of judges, and establishing the correct understanding of the rhetoric of the arguments by the general public.