论文部分内容阅读
郏啸寅诽谤案等相似案例和事例暴露了我国普遍存在的不良匿名言论人责任承担过重的情况。而这种责任承担过重的原因是部分地方国家机关或其中的相关部门不时表现出来的“舆论过敏症”与我国社会各种言论之间常常发生的“言论功能紊乱症”。当匿名言论涉及公权力时应该加强对言论表达者的法律保护。对显然有过错并且造成了不良后果者应该追究其责任,但同时应严格依法律办事。我国有必要逐步改革有关惩治言论的立法,完善政府信息公开制度和言论、出版等自由的保护制度,建立公民隐私权保护制度,进一步限制行政权力,尤其要真正保障检察机关独立行使检察权、法院独立行使审判权。当匿名言论可能侵犯其他公民的基本权利时,应该对有关主体和发布渠道加强管理或限制。
Similar cases and examples, such as the case of Xiaoyin Yin, exposed the over-commitment of the bad anonymous speaker in our country. And this responsibility is overburdened because of the “speech disorder” that often occurs between “public opinion allergies” and various kinds of public opinion in our country from time to time in some local state organs or among relevant departments. When anonymous remarks involve public power, the legal protection of those who express their opinions should be strengthened. Those who are clearly at fault and have caused unfortunate consequences should be investigated for their responsibilities, but at the same time they should act strictly in accordance with the law. It is necessary for our country to gradually reform the legislation on punishing speech, improve the system of free disclosure of government information, freedom of speech and publication, establish a system of protecting the privacy of citizens, and further restrict administrative power. In particular, we must ensure that procuratorial organs independently exercise their power of procuratorial work. Independent exercise of judicial power. When anonymous remarks may infringe upon the basic rights of other citizens, the relevant subjects and distribution channels should be more regulated or restricted.