最近重读钟华楠先生80年代写的一篇文章《“抄”与“超”》,结合室内设计专业的情况,仔细揣摩,很有教益。 近几年,我们在文章中、在论坛上对”抄”谈论很多。一般都对”抄”抱批评态度。《”抄”与“超”》帮我们把问题深挖了一层,读了有些感触: 为何而“抄” “抄”有多种情况,如果不分青红皂白一概都打五十大板,其中肯定有冤枉的。从文章中可以看出,钟先生善于分析,并加以区别对待。 Recently rereading an article written by Zhong Huanan in the 1980s, “copying” and “super”, combined with the situation of the interior design profession, carefully studying and instructive. In recent years, we have talked about “copying” in articles and forums. Generally speaking, they are critical of copying. “Copy” and “Super” helped us to dig deeper into the problem and read some feelings: Why did “copying” and “copying” have many kinds of situations? If indiscriminate, we would all play 50 boards, among them There must be something wrong. It can be seen from the article that Mr. Zhong is good at analysis and treats them differently.