论文部分内容阅读
本文对部分专家学者提出以哈拉古城为齐齐哈尔城史纪元之说提出疑问。一、哈拉古城是齐齐哈尔考古发现最早的城址。二、齐齐哈尔、卜奎之称与庞葛、哈拉之称无任何联系。三、定庞葛即哈拉古城的史料及考古证据不足。四,如以北京、哈尔滨,沈阳改写建城史为例,比金代哈拉古城还早的是辽泰州(泰来塔子城);如定金代的亦应是蒲与路路治(克东金城乡古城),而不是哈拉古城。
This article put forward some questions to some experts and scholars that the ancient city of Alhajd is the historical era of Qiqihar city. First, the ancient city of Jara is Qiqihar discovered the earliest archaeological site. Second, Qiqihar, Bu Kui said and Pang Ge, Hara said no contact. Third, set pang Gela ancient city’s historical and archaeological evidence is insufficient. Fourth, as in Beijing, Harbin, Shenyang, rewrite the history of the city as an example, earlier than the ancient city of Jindal is Liao Taizhou (Tailai Taizi City); such as Ding Jin generation should also be Po Road and Lu governance Urban and rural cities), rather than the ancient city of Jara.