论文部分内容阅读
但凡一门以科学命名自身的学科之研究,其学科自立无外乎两个方面的内容,一为知识,一为方法。宪法学作为一种科学,其自立亦由此二者来构架。宪法学之不能自立,缘由在于方法论受制于政治学,但是否可置宪法学知识个性构成及学科关联于不顾,单论成理,是值得商榷的问题。另,宪法学方法论是混淆于政治学方法论中无从辨认,还是泯然于一般法学方法论中无法觅形,应持有一个清醒的认识。
Whenever a study of science named its own discipline, its discipline is nothing less than two aspects of content, one for knowledge, one for the method. Constitutional law as a science, its independence from both the framework. Constitutional law can not be independent, because the methodology is subject to political science, but whether to constitution constitutional knowledge of individuality and academic disregard, single reasoning, is questionable. In addition, the methodology of constitutional law is confused in the political methodology can not identify, or suddenly in the general legal methodology can not find shape, should hold a clear understanding.