论文部分内容阅读
目的比较不同雾化吸入方式治疗重症儿童哮喘的效果。方法50例重症儿童哮喘患儿随机分成两组,各25例,观察组采用氧气雾化吸入仪、对照组采用空气压缩泵雾化吸入器。结果治疗后两组的第一秒钟用力呼气容积(FEV1),最大呼气峰流速(PEF),PaO_2、PaCO_2均有所改善,观察组的治疗效果优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论临床应用应根据患儿病症的状况和不同需求选择雾化吸入方式,以达到经济和疗效的尽可能统一。
Objective To compare the effects of different inhalation methods on asthma in critically ill children. Methods Fifty children with severe asthma were randomly divided into two groups (n = 25 each). Oxygen inhalation was used in the observation group and air compression pump was used to atomize the inhaler in the control group. Results The first second forced expiratory volume (FEV1), maximum expiratory flow (PEF), PaO_2 and PaCO_2 were improved in both groups after treatment. The therapeutic effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Clinical application should be based on the condition of children with different needs and choose the mode of inhalation in order to achieve the economic and efficacy as uniform as possible.