研究生们在论文答辩和学术投稿时经常得到的反馈意见是“学术理论性不强”或“理论深度不够”。而这种“学术理论性”或“学术理论深度”确实是评价学术成果的关键性指标,绝非可有可无、漫无边际的东西。笔者在《山东大学学报》(哲社版)做过十年的理论编辑,后来在山东大学政管学院教书十多年, Feedback often received by postgraduates in dissertation defense and academic submissions is either “poorly scholarly in theory” or “insufficient depth of theory.” And such “academic theory” or “depth of academic theory” are indeed the key indicators for evaluating academic achievements. They are by no means dispensable and far-reaching. The author in “Journal of Shandong University” (Zhezhe version) has done a decade of theoretical editors, and later taught in Shandong University School of Management for more than 10 years,