论文部分内容阅读
中国古代有重建损毁建筑之传统,或因表达文化传承之精神,或因地方记忆再现之需要。近代以来,由于对建筑遗产历史价值的强调,基于历史真实性的考虑,国际遗产保护领域将“重建”视为一种不可接受的遗产保护行为,明确反对建筑遗产的重建。然而,“重建”部分承载了地方文化记忆的建筑遗产,客观上具有复兴地方文明、延续文化记忆之意义。特别是随着人类文化视野的逐渐开阔,基于文化多样性及遗产文化价值再现的目的,“重建”已逐渐成为国际遗产保护领域讨论的热点,《奈良文件》的达成,表明遗产真实性应该在不同文化背景下予以思考。在当代中国传统文化复兴的语境下,重建部分已毁的标志性建筑对于民族文化之传承、城市精神之弘扬有一定的意义。
In ancient China, there was a tradition of rebuilding damaged buildings, or because of the spirit of cultural heritage or because of local memories. In modern times, due to the emphasis on the historical value of architectural heritage, based on historical authenticity, the field of international heritage protection regards “reconstruction ” as an unacceptable protection of the heritage and explicitly opposes the reconstruction of architectural heritage. However, the “reconstruction” part of the architectural heritage bearing the local cultural memory objectively rejuvenates the local civilization and extends the meaning of cultural memory. Especially with the gradual broadening of the cultural horizon of mankind, based on the purpose of cultural diversity and the reproduction of cultural values of heritage, “Reconstruction ” has become a hot topic of discussion in the field of international heritage protection, and the “Nara Document” has been reached, indicating the authenticity of the heritage Should think in different cultural backgrounds. In the context of the rejuvenation of traditional Chinese culture, it is of some significance to rebuild some of the destroyed landmark buildings for the inheritance of national culture and the promotion of urban spirit.