也许会有一种演绎与想象,恰巧最为接近真实。到底哪一个版本的历史才最接近真实?历史书上关于义和团的这段历史,曾经是否真的作为经历发生过?而如今呈现在我们眼前的,是作为事件的“历史”还是作为“神话”的历史?经历、事件、神话是泾渭分明的吗?许多人认为它们三者各行其道,而笔者却模糊地看到密密麻麻的细线缠绕在它们之间,也许那细线便是无法摒弃的人情。 There may be a deduction and imagination that happens to be the closest to reality. Which version of history is the closest to reality? Has this history of the Boxers actually happened as an experience? Now it is with us whether it is “history” as an event or " Myths are quite different? Many people think that all three go its own ways, but the author is vaguely aware of the dense thin thread twining between them. Perhaps the thin thread is Can not abandon the human.