论文部分内容阅读
近几年,我在《国画家》上多次发文谈到“国学”中的国画与“美术”中的国画的相关问题,并以“外语学院”中的英语与“美术学院”中的英语为类比,指出近代以来,张大千、黄宾虹、齐白石、陆俨少等为“国学”中的国画,而李可染、林风眠、周思聪、吴冠中一路为“美术”中的国画。而由于今天的国画,完全为“美术”所统辖,失去了“国学”的背景,在美术学院的教学中,可以培养出李可染一路的画家,却难以培养出张大千一路的画家,亦即“国学”中的国画面临着断层。
In recent years, on the “Chinese Painter”, I have repeatedly talked about the related issues of the traditional Chinese painting in “Guoxue” and the “traditional Chinese painting” in “Fine Arts” As an analogy of English in Academy of Fine Arts, it points out that in modern times, Zhang Daqian, Huang Binhong, Qi Baishi, Lu Yanzhao are the traditional Chinese paintings in Guoxue and Li Keran, Lin Fengmian, Chinese painting. However, because of today’s traditional Chinese painting, it is entirely under the jurisdiction of “Art ” and has lost the background of “Guoxue ”. In the art academy teaching, Li paints can be cultivated all the way, but it is difficult to train Zhang Daqian painter, That is to say, the Chinese painting in Guoxue is facing a fault.