论文部分内容阅读
菲尼斯新古典自然法理论的渊源,表现为他对自然法理论史的理解。这种理解包括三大部分。首先,批评法实证主义对自然法的误读;这种误读体现在法实证主义误读了自然法的有效性概念、授权理论、有关人类团结之目标的立场及其与实在法的关系等方面。其次,解析休谟对现代自然法传统中义务理论的批评,认为该理论不能揭示义务的正当性基础。最后,论证“是”与“应当”无法相互推导;通过检讨斯通的观点,菲尼斯分析了人们认为自然法含有从“是”推导出“应当”这一非法推论的主要原因;通过与麦金纳尼的论战,菲尼斯捍卫了有关世界的知识与实践理性的相关性;通过与维奇的论战,菲尼斯更加全面地捍卫了“是”与“应当”无法相互推导这一命题。
The origins of Phoenix’s neo-classical theory of natural law are reflected in his understanding of the theoretical history of natural law. This understanding includes three parts. First of all, criticize the misunderstanding of natural law by the positivists; this kind of misreading is reflected in the fact that the positivism misread the concept of the validity of natural law, the theory of delegation of authority, the position on the goal of human solidarity and its relationship with the real law . Secondly, to analyze Hume’s critique of the obligation theory in the tradition of the natural law, the theory can not reveal the legitimate basis of the obligation. Finally, argumentation “is ” and “should ” can not be deduced from each other. By examining Stone’s point of view, Phoenix analyzes that people think that natural law contains the illegality of deducing “should ” from “yes Through the polemics with McKinney, Phoenix defended the relevance of knowledge about the world and practical rationality. Through the polemics with Vichy, Phoenix more completely defended the relationship between ”Yes “ and ”Should " can not deduce this proposition from each other.