论文部分内容阅读
从曹娥形象及其信仰的历史演变过程来看,以“礼”而言,在官方,作为历史人物的孝行教化,用以规范德行;以“俗”而言,在民间,作为水神(江神、潮神)信仰的功能凸显,用以祈福免灾。但重要的是,我们必须意识到,从出现伊始这两者并不是泾渭分明的,而是互为影响,双方互动的结果也不是彼此消长而是多元展开。以曹娥信仰为例对礼俗互动进行探讨,主要考察曹娥信仰内涵发生置换的逻辑是多元形象(水神、孝女、N种融合体)并存状态的形成,说明礼俗互动在某种意义上来说并不能只是从上下关系来考虑,而是互为平行交织形成一种平衡关系,进而生发多元性,各自都发挥作用以维持社会的稳定。
From the perspective of the evolution of Cao’e’s image and belief in the past, “filial piety” in official terms and as historical figures are used to standardize virtue and morality. In terms of "vulgarity As God of water (River god, tidal god) faith highlights the function, to bless disaster relief. However, what is important is that we must realize that the two are not distinct from the beginning but are mutually influential and that the result of the interaction between the two parties does not grow out of each other but rather multiply. Taking Cao’e belief as an example, the author discusses the interaction between etiquettes and customs, mainly investigating the logic of replacement of the connotation of Cao’e’s belief is the coexistence of multiple images (Water God, Filial Piety and N kinds of fusions), indicating that Etiquette and Euphemism interact in a certain sense It can not be considered only from the top to the bottom. Instead, they are mutually interwoven to form a balanced relationship, which in turn gives rise to multiple elements and each plays a role in maintaining social stability.