论文部分内容阅读
目的通过52例临床病例总结,探讨围绝经期综合征中西医结合标准化治疗的方法。方法2003年3月至2007年6月门诊52例女患者,年龄(48.1±7.9)岁,临床及实验室检查符合围绝经期综合征诊断患者随机分为三组,分别采用纯西医激素替代治疗、纯中药经典治疗、中西医结合标准化治疗,通过Kupperman评分标准来评估治疗后前病情,对照疗效,并通过SAS软件统计分析。结果三组临床病例组内治疗前后Kupperman评分均有显著差异,组间比较纯西医激素替代治疗组与中西医结合标准化治疗组有高度显著差异、纯中药经典治疗组与中西医结合标准化治疗组有显著差异。结论三种治疗方法对围绝经期综合征均有疗效,其中中西医结合标准化治疗组疗效明显优于其他方法。
Objective To summarize the clinical cases of 52 cases to explore the method of standardized treatment of perimenopausal syndrome with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine. Methods From March 2003 to June 2007, 52 female patients (age 48.1 ± 7.9) were enrolled in this study. Patients with perimenopausal syndrome were randomly divided into three groups according to the clinical and laboratory tests. Pure western medicine hormone replacement therapy , Pure classic Chinese medicine treatment, standardized treatment of traditional Chinese and Western medicine, Kupperman score to assess the pre-treatment condition and control efficacy, and through the SAS software statistical analysis. Results The Kupperman scores of three groups of clinical cases before and after treatment were significantly different. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the pure Western medicine hormone replacement therapy group and the standardization treatment group of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine. The classical Chinese medicine treatment group and the integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine treatment group had Significant differences. Conclusion The three treatment methods are effective on perimenopausal syndrome, of which the traditional Chinese and western medicine combined with standardized treatment group was significantly better than other methods.