论文部分内容阅读
【目的】揭示专家审稿意见在科技期刊论文中合理呈现的价值、形式和基本要求,为其深度开发利用提供借鉴。【方法】从科技期刊中充分搜集呈现专家审稿意见的例文,并参考相关研究成果,分析对比,总结归纳。【结果】发现纸质期刊随文刊载专家审稿意见并不普遍;主要分布于脚注和文后注释中,正文中较为罕见;形式上多为笼统致谢,具体描述专家审稿意见及本人处理情况的不多。【结论】专家审稿意见的合理呈现具有可行性和必要性,对其普及和推行有利于形成新的学术规范,加强审稿规范化,完善审稿机制,提高科技期刊利益各方的学术水平,推动学术繁荣。
【Objective】 To reveal the value, form and basic requirements reasonably presented by expert reviewers in the papers of sci-tech periodicals and to provide references for their in-depth exploitation and utilization. 【Method】 From the sci-tech periodicals, we have fully collected the examples that present the opinions of experts for review, and made reference to the related research results, analyzed and contrasted, and summarized them. 【Results】 It is found that paper journals have not been widely published in the articles published by experts. They are mainly distributed in footnotes and postscripts, which are rare in the texts. Most of them are general acknowledgments, which describe the opinions of experts and their handling not much. 【Conclusion】 It is feasible and necessary to reasonably present the opinions of expert reviewers. It is helpful to popularize and promote the new academic norms, strengthen the standardization of reviewers, improve the manuscript review mechanism, improve the academic standards of all parties involved in scientific journals, Promote academic prosperity.