论文部分内容阅读
郑玄在注释《十月之交》时对《六月》的创作年代提出了不同意见,认为是汉初经师有意改动了篇目次序。这说明毛诗学派对宣王有特别的偏爱,一定要把宣王当作承接正雅和开启变雅的关键性人物,着力塑造其形象;而《六月》则被用来充当正变雅的转折点。本文通过分析毛诗学派对“宣王变雅”的阐释,希望对更深入地理解毛诗学派的历史化释诗方式有所启发。
Zheng Xuan put forward a different opinion on the writing age of “June” when he commented on “The Turn of October”, which he thought was a deliberate attempt by the early Han scholars to change the order of the articles. This shows that the Maoist school has a special preference for King Xuan, and must regard Xuan Wang as a key figure in accepting the elegance and opening of the elegance. His “June” is used to serve as a turning point for being positive. This paper analyzes the Maoist school “Xuan Wang Ya” interpretation, hoping to have a deeper understanding of Maoist school’s historic interpretation of the poem inspired.