论文部分内容阅读
秉持公心对 2 0世纪中国文学正反两方面的经验进行反思是一项严肃而庄重的学术工程。然而 ,在解构主义和后殖民主义思潮影响下 ,近来一些作家和批评家撰文情绪化地颠覆鲁迅。能对鲁迅说三道四、评头品足虽然是一种学术自由的表现 ,但学术自由是既有颠覆鲁迅者的自由 ,也有颠覆颠覆鲁迅者的自由。学术自由的土壤应该生长出枝繁叶茂的文化果实而不应该只是堆积文化垃圾。应该承认 ,鲁迅洞见中国文化、历史与社会的深度及其自由主体之存在的深度是 2 0世纪其他作家和当今那些以颠覆鲁迅为快意的作家们所不及的 ,因此 ,对于 2 1世纪中国文学而言 ,重要的不是怎样颠覆鲁迅 ,而是更深入地学习鲁迅并争取超越鲁迅
It is a serious and dignified academic project to rejoice in upholding the positive and negative experiences of Chinese literature in the 20th century. However, under the influence of deconstruction and post-colonialism, some writers and critics have recently written an emotional subversion of Lu Xun. Although it is an expression of academic freedom, academic freedom is both freedom to subvert Lu Xun and the freedom to subvert Lu Xun. The soil of academic freedom should grow lush cultural fruits rather than accumulate cultural waste. It should be acknowledged that the depth of Lu Xun’s insight into Chinese culture, history and society as well as the depth of his free agent are beyond the reach of other writers in the 20th century and current writers who wanted to subvert Lu Xun. Therefore, for the 21st century Chinese literature The important thing is not how to subvert Lu Xun, but to learn more about Lu Xun and strive to surpass Lu Xun