抽烟和芝诺悖论一样,都内含着理性二难,如果想对之进行理性分析的话,往往会不自觉地走向其反面。究其原因,在于我们忘记意义是如何生成以及缺乏实践的维度。以抽烟为例,初看起来,其内中充满理性不能分析的矛盾,但正因如此,事物的本质及其意义才在最广大的视域中被展现出来,这就是抽烟以其全部的悖论告诉我们的实践的必然性。 As with the Zeno paradox, smoking contains rational dilemmas, which tend to unconsciously go to the opposite if they are to be rationally analyzed. The reason is that we forget how the meaning is generated and the lack of practical dimensions. Take smoking as an example. At first glance, there seems to be a contradiction in which rationality can not be analyzed. But for this reason, the essence and significance of things are revealed in the broadest field of vision. On the inevitability of telling us practice.