比喻论证和类比论证之间的差异主要表现在以下几个方面:第一,比喻论证的两个因素(喻体与本体)是“异类”相比而有“相似”点,类比论证的两个因素(类体与本体)是“同类”相比而有“相同”点.第二,比喻论证是通过具体生动的比喻来形象地论证抽象的道理的论证方法,而类比论证则是拿另一种同类的已知事物同所要论证的事物作比较,根据已知事物的一些性质,类推出要证明 Differences between metaphorical argumentation and analogy argument are mainly reflected in the following aspects: First, the two factors of figurative argumentation (figures and ontology) are “similar” compared to “different” and the analogy is two. Factors (class bodies and ontology) are “identical” compared to “same class”. Second, metaphorical argumentation is the demonstration of abstract reasoning through vivid and concrete metaphors. The analogy argument is to take another. The same kind of known things are compared with the things to be demonstrated, according to some properties of known things, the class is launched to prove