论文部分内容阅读
《战时中国历史研究》原系一九四五年八月三日郭沫若在莫斯科苏联对外文化协会历史哲学组所作的讲演词,俄译节略稿刊载于当年十二月号苏联《历史问题》杂志。第二年,文雄又将节略稿译回,载于重庆的《中国学术》 (季刊)第一卷(创刊号),八月一日发行。《郭沫若全集》、《沫若文集》,以及全国解放后出的有关集子,均未收入。关于这次在苏联莫斯科的学术讲演,郭沫若在《苏联纪行》中几处提到过。一九四五年七月五日,郭沫若在苏联科学院历史研究所作报告,“主要的说到抗战以来的历史研究,通史的酝酿,古代社会的争辩,历代农民革命运动的关心,封建制长期停滞的探源”。八月三日晚,在苏联对外文化协会作历史报告,“将前次在历史研究所中所作报告略略加了一些补充。……历一小时完毕,有种种质问,均为之作答”。这里再次发表的节略稿,与郭沫若本人在《纪行》中所说的内容相比,多了关于先秦哲学和古代思想史的研究,缺了“历代农民革命运动的关心”。原因何在?待考。
The Study of the History of Wartime was originally made by Guo Moruo on August 3, 1945, at the historical philosophical group of the Soviet Association for Cultural Studies of the Soviet Union in Moscow, published in the December issue of the Soviet Union entitled History Issues . The following year, Wen Xiong translated the abstracts again and published the first volume of “Chinese Studies” (Quarterly) in Chongqing (the first issue), which was released on August 1. The Complete Works of Guo Moruo, The Book of Morphology, and the related episodes after the liberation of China did not generate any income. Regarding this academic lecture in Moscow, the Soviet Union, Guo Moruo mentioned several points in the “Soviet Trip.” On July 5, 1945, Guo Moruo made a report at the Institute of History of the Soviet Academy of Sciences. “The main points are the historical research since the Anti-Japanese War, the deliberation of the general history, the debate in ancient society, the peasant revolutionary movement’s concern over the long history of feudalism Stagnation of the source. ” On the night of August 3, I made a historical report in the Foreign Cultural Association of the Soviet Union, “adding a little more to the previous report made at the Institute of History .... After one hour, there are all kinds of questions, all of which are answered” . The abridged draft again published here compared with what Guo Moruo himself said in the “discipline and discipline”, more about the study of pre-Qin philosophy and the history of ancient thoughts, and lack of “concern for the peasant revolution movement in successive generations.” Why?