论文部分内容阅读
在商标授权、确权案件的司法审查中,一般将商标能否被核准注册或维持有效的事由分为相对禁止事由和绝对禁止事由。《商标法》第四十一条第一款规定的“以欺骗手段注册商标”属于绝对禁止的事由,对于该条款的含义、适用的阶段及其具体的适用条件,在司法实践中一直存在不同的认识。本文以“NTK”商标撤销复审案为例,就司法实践中关于“以欺骗手段注册商标”的认定情形展开分析与思考,以求能夠有助于对该问题的理解。
In the judicial review of the trademark authorization and the confirmation of the right, the reasons for whether the trademark can be approved for registration or maintaining validity are generally divided into relatively prohibited reasons and absolutely prohibited reasons. Article 41 (1) of the Trademark Law stipulates that “the registration of a trademark by fraudulent means” is an absolutely prohibited matter. The meaning of the term, the stage to be applied and its specific conditions of application have always been the subject of judicial practice There is a different understanding. This paper takes the case of “NTK” trademark revocation review as an example to analyze and think about the cognizance of “trademark registration by deception” in judicial practice in order to help to understand the issue.