读罢杜广学老师针对杨宝生《植杖“释义勘正》写的商榷文章(见《语文学习》2009年第3期《〈”植杖“释义勘正〉的勘正》),笔者深为其一字不肯放松的严谨治学精神所感动。然而,仔细品玩该文,发现其中有不少逻辑未通之处,若不加以辨识,很容易误导师生。首先,关于”杖“的定义,杜文对《说文解字注》的相关部分作了较为完整的引用,将”凡可持 Reading Du Guangxue's essays on Yang Baosheng's “The Sticking Stick's Interpretation and Reconciliation” (see “Language Learning”, No. 3, 2009, “<”Planking Sticks“ Interpretation and Correction of the Correctness)”, the author Deeply moved by the spirit of rigorous scholarship in which he refused to relax, however, carefully playing with this article found that many of them had logics that were unreasonable and that it was easy to mislead the tutor if they were not identified. As for the definition of “”, Du Wen made a complete reference to the relevant part of the “Shuo Wen Jie Zi Zhu”, and it will