论文部分内容阅读
基于《第二次冲突法重述》存在的缺陷、对冲突法革命进行反思与总结之需及国际因素的深化等原因,美国法学会已启动的《第三次冲突法重述》的编纂工作无疑是必要的,其也代表了美国冲突法的新发展。在理论基础方面,为实现法律适用的确定性目标,《第三次冲突法重述》应摒弃《第二次冲突法重述》的折中主义,在以法律关系地域化方法为理论基础的前提下,适当吸纳现代选法理论。在具体规则方面,应反思《第二次冲突法重述》第6条规定的开放式冲突规则,改进第145条与第188条规定的连结点集群式冲突规则,以及软化以第233条为代表的硬性冲突规则。美国冲突法的新发展表明,选法理论的多元化成为当代冲突法发展中的一种客观现象,当今冲突法仍然需要在确定性与个案正义之间寻求适当平衡,司法本地化的狭隘思维应被摒弃。
Based on the flaws in the “Restatement of the Second Conflict Law”, the necessity of reviewing and concluding the revolution in the Conflict Law, and the deepening of international factors, the American Law Society has started the compilation of “The Third Conflict of Law” It is undoubtedly necessary, and it also represents the new development of Conflict Law in the United States. On the theoretical basis, in order to achieve the certainty of the application of law, “the third conflict law restatement” should abandon the eclecticism of “the second conflict law restatement”. On the basis of the method of regionalization of legal relationship On the premise, properly absorb the modern theory of election law. In terms of specific rules, we should reflect on the open conflict rules stipulated in Article 6 of the “Restatement of the Second Conflict of Law”, improve the cluster-based conflict rules laid down in Articles 145 and 188, Representative of the rigid conflict rules. The new development of Conflict Law in the United States shows that the diversification of the theory of election law has become an objective phenomenon in the development of contemporary conflict of laws. Today’s Conflict Law still needs to find an appropriate balance between certainty and case justice, and the narrow thinking of localization of judicature Abandoned.