论文部分内容阅读
行政程序法目标模式的选择体现了立法的价值取向,并确定了立法的基本架构。因此,目标模式是制定行政程序法的先决问题,选择什么样的目标模式对行政程序法的发展具有重要的作用。目前,法学界对行政程序法应具备目标模式并未达成共识,因此,对行政程序法目标模式的研究将有利于推动我国行政程序法的制定。本文从比较法的视角对现代西方国家分别以美国和奥地利为典型代表两大目标模式——控权模式和服务模式进行阐述,从中比较和借鉴,再结合我国法律体系建设进程并提出在转型期的中国大陆的行政程序法宜选择控权模式、维权模式和服务模式并重模式作为其目标模式,希望本文对中国大陆行政程序法的法典化有所裨益。
The choice of the target mode of administrative procedure law embodies the value orientation of legislation and determines the basic structure of legislation. Therefore, the target model is to formulate a prerequisite administrative procedure law, what kind of target model to choose for the development of administrative procedure law has an important role. At present, the jurisprudence has not reached a consensus on the target mode of administrative procedure law. Therefore, the research on the target mode of administrative procedure law will be helpful to promote the formulation of administrative procedure law in our country. This article from the perspective of comparative law, the modern western countries, respectively, the United States and Austria as the representative of the two major target model - control mode and service model to elaborate, from the comparison and reference, combined with China’s legal system construction process and proposed during the transition period The administrative procedural law in mainland China should select the mode of equal rights control, rights protection mode and service mode as its target mode. I hope this article will benefit the codification of administrative procedural law in mainland China.