论文部分内容阅读
我国科研资助以申请书为主要判断标准的做法并不能保证所资助课题的科研质量。为了判断课题资助级别与课题研究成果是否相关,我们选取了全国教育科学规划项目中“国家一般”和“教育部重点”项目的结项数据为对象,对代表课题成果质量的论文复合影响因子和论文他引频次作为配对比较项目,在配对T检验的基础上发现这两种级别的课题并不存在“一分钱一分货”的经济学规律和“钱多影响力大”的营销学规律,这说明现行的“标书导向”的科研项目资助制度未能起到应有的作用。对此,我们建议实行项目申请者学术能力积点制,采取绩效导向型资助方式、公开项目信息,改变单一政府主导的科研资助模式,逐步引入并形成非政府组织管理国家科研资助的模式。
The application of research funding in China as the main criterion does not guarantee the quality of scientific research funded. In order to determine whether the funding level of the project is related to the research results of the project, we select the data of the final items of the “National General” and “Key of the Ministry of Education” in the National Education Science Planning Project as the object, Compound impact factors and papers cited his cited times as a comparisons project, based on the paired T test found that the two levels of the subject does not exist, “Penny stocks” economic law and This shows that the current subsidy system for scientific research projects failed to play its due role. In this regard, we propose implementing the point-by-point system for academic ability of project applicants, adopting performance-oriented funding, disclosing project information, changing the mode of single government-led research funding, and gradually introducing and forming a model for non-governmental organizations to manage state research funding.