论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨心理干预对哮喘患者情绪状态的影响,以期为哮喘患者心理干预提供科学依据。方法将符合条件的哮喘患者随机分为干预组(110例)和非干预组(106例),在入院第2天采用哮喘患者一般情况调查表、述情障碍(TAS-26)及简式简明心境问卷(POMS-SF)对患者进行测查。非干预组行常规治疗,干预组在常规治疗的基础上进行心理干预。两组患者在出院前1天,应用TAS-26、POMS-SF进行测查。结果除因子外,与常模比较,哮喘患者组的TAS各因子分及总分均高于常模(P<0.01);干预后,干预组TAS总分、、因子分及POMS总分、各负性因子分均低于非干预组(P<0.05或P<0.01);干预组POMS的VA因子分高于非干预组(P<0.01)。结论哮喘患者存有明显的述情障碍,心理干预能改善其述情障碍,明显改善哮喘患者的情绪。
Objective To investigate the effect of psychological intervention on the emotional state of asthmatic patients, with a view to providing a scientific basis for psychological intervention in patients with asthma. Methods Eligible asthma patients were randomly divided into intervention group (n = 110) and non-intervention group (n = 106). On the second day after hospitalization, the general condition questionnaire, asthmatic disorder (TAS-26) and concise The mood questionnaire (POMS-SF) examined patients. Non-intervention group routine treatment, intervention group on the basis of routine treatment for psychological intervention. One day before discharge, two groups of patients were tested with TAS-26 and POMS-SF. Results Compared with normotensive group, the scores of TAS and total score in asthma group were higher than those in normotensive group (P <0.01). After intervention, TAS score, POMS score and POMS score Negative factor scores were lower than non-intervention group (P <0.05 or P <0.01). POMS in intervention group was higher than non-intervention group (P <0.01). Conclusion Asthmatic patients have obvious emphysema, and psychological intervention can improve their emphysema and significantly improve the mood of asthmatic patients.