论文部分内容阅读
当前商主体理论在廓清商主体的边界和体系上存在重大不足,更欠缺商主体的立体构成描述,商主体范围过于狭窄并出现诸如企业集团等灰色主体,企业集团可以从事部分商事行为,但涉诉后的商主体地位及诉讼主体地位尴尬不明,既不能满足商事交易需要,也不能公平公正解决商事纠纷。从应然性的层面分析,法经济学的交易成本理论解释了商主体样态的多元化需求,管理学中的价值链理论解释了商主体立体构成的客观性。从实然状况看,大量出现的企业集团以及从事商事行为的必要性、普遍性和现实性要求商法赋予其商主体地位,而不宜继续保留这些灰色主体。
At present, the main body of business theory has major deficiencies in defining the boundary and system of the main body of business, but also lacks the description of the three-dimensional structure of the main body of the business. The scope of the main business body is too narrow and gray bodies such as enterprise groups appear. Enterprises groups can engage in some commercial activities, The vantage point of the business entity after the lawsuit and the status of the litigant body are not clear. They can neither satisfy the needs of commercial transactions nor resolve commercial disputes in a fair and equitable manner. From the point of view of the reasonableness, the transaction cost theory of law and economics explains the diversified needs of the business entity, and the value chain theory in the management explains the objectivity of the business entity. Judging from the actual situation, the large number of enterprise groups and the necessity, universality and reality of engaging in commercial activities demand that the commercial law should be given the status of their merchants and should not be reserved for these gray bodies.