论文部分内容阅读
柏拉图和亚里士多德诗学观念迥异,但两者共同构成了西方诗学的源头。柏拉图的形而上学体系为驱除诗人、确立哲学家的领导地位提供了理论依据,而亚里士多德的诗学处处针对柏拉图的诗歌贬值论,认定现实界与上界相通,赋予感性以合法地位,并且将诗歌看成探测理性的通道,从而奠定了诗的合法性。值得注意的是,由于他们哲学基础的一致性,我们可以在这两种迥异的理论中发现它们互通的道路,这也是两者能够同时成为西方诗学源头的内在原因。
Plato’s and Aristotle’s poetic concepts are quite different, but both together constitute the source of Western poetics. Plato’s metaphysical system provides a theoretical basis for expelling the poet and establishing the philosopher’s leading position. Aristotle’s poetics is aimed at the devaluation theory of Plato’s poetry, finds that the real world and the upper bound are connected, and the sensibility is given a legal status. And regards poetry as the passage of probing rationality, thus laying down the legitimacy of the poem. It is noteworthy that due to the consistency of their philosophical foundations, we can find their way of intercommunication in these two very different theories, which is why both can become the source of Western poetics at the same time.