论文部分内容阅读
各位同仁,千万不要被文章的标题所迷惑,我烦超频,可不是说我没超过频。正确的讲,我恐怕比大多数人的“超频史”都要长。从486DX Ⅱ 66跳到80(以失败告终)开始,经历了奔腾时代的133超到166,也用过赛扬300A超到450,要不是最近我的赛扬533“光荣”了,害得我又买了一个,也许我会一直超频到老。但现在,我觉悟了,我甚至开始怀疑所谓“超频说”是一个阴谋,一个天大的阴谋!我怀疑这是CPU的厂商为了加速淘汰其旧产品、推出新产品的一个策略。傻子都知道,800的CPU一定比533的贵,厂家为什么还要拿它当533的卖,我认为原因只有一个,就是它确实只能当533的用,你非要超到800,最直接的后果就是缩短CPU的寿命,谁高兴,你超频,当然是CPU的厂商高兴。我绝对不单单是因为我的CPU报废了才烦超频,这只是一个原因。另一个
Dear colleagues, do not be confused by the title of the article, I’m annoying overclocking, is not that I did not exceed the frequency. Correctly speaking, I am probably longer than most people “overclocking history.” From 486DX Ⅱ 66 jump to 80 (ended in failure), has gone through the Pentium era of 133 to 166, also used the Celeron 300A to 450, or if not my recent Celeron 533 “glorious”, and hurt me I bought one, maybe I will always overclocked to the old. But now, I realize that I even started to suspect that the so-called Overclocking is a conspiracy and a big conspiracy! I suspect this is a strategy for CPU makers to introduce new products to expedite the phase-out of their old products. Fools know that the CPU 800 must be more expensive than the 533, why manufacturers should take it when 533 to sell, I think there is only one reason that it can only be used when the 533, you have to exceed 800, the most direct The consequence is to shorten the life of the CPU, who happy, you overclock, of course, CPU manufacturers happy. I am definitely not just annoyed overclocking because of my CPU scrapped, this is only one reason. another