八达岭野生动物园老虎吃人事件一经报道随即在网上引发热议,对于该案中谁是责任主题的争论甚嚣尘上,持“动物园有责说”的人坚称园方与游客订立的责任协议书存在格式条款无效事由,不能免责;持“动物园无责说”的人则以动物园已尽管理职责,不存在过错,不构成侵权来回应。针对该事件,本文将以清晰的逻辑与法律视角进行一一分析,以冀有助于理清该事件中动物园与游客的责任,解决各自的责任承担问题。 The Tiger eating incident in Badaling Safari Zoo was immediately reported online, sparking controversy over who is the subject of responsibility in the case. The people holding the “zoo’s responsibility” insisted that the agreement of responsibility signed between the park and tourists There are invalid terms of the format clause, can not be exempted; holding “zoo no account ” people Zeyi zoo has managed responsibilities, there is no fault, does not constitute infringement to respond. In response to this incident, this article will carry out an analysis from a clear logical and legal perspective so as to help clarify the responsibilities of zoos and tourists in this incident and solve their respective responsibilities.